For older adults, a daily multivitamin may slightly slow the aging process, new research suggests.
In a randomized study of 958 older adults, those who took a multivitamin daily for two years experienced slowed so-called biological aging by about four months. That is, during the 24 months, they aged only 20 months at a cellular level.
Whereas chronological age measures how much time has passed since birth, biological age reflects wear and tear on the body at a cellular level. The two don’t necessarily match up. For example, a person might be 50 years old chronologically yet have a biological age of 47 or 54 depending on factors such as genetics, lifestyle habits and medical history.
Howard Sesso, the associate director of preventive medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School and the study’s senior author, cautioned that the results don’t mean a multivitamin adds four months to a person’s lifespan.
“What it means is that your trajectory of health moving forward should stand to benefit,” he said. “It’s hard to know what those four months truly translate to.”
What’s more, people who had shown signs of accelerated biological aging at the start of the trial saw a greater benefit from daily multivitamins. The findings were published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine.
The study was part of the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS), a large Brigham and Women’s Hospital trial designed to show whether cocoa extract and/or multivitamins reduce the risk of developing cancer and heart disease. Researchers focused on a subset of healthy older adults: men 60 and older and women 65 and older, with an average chronological age of 70.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups and took the following pills daily: cocoa extract and a multivitamin; a multivitamin; cocoa extract; or placebos.
The study was funded in part by Haleon, formerly Pfizer Consumer Healthcare, which provided the multivitamins, and Mars Inc., which provided the cocoa extract. Sesso and another author received funding from both companies, neither of which contributed to research design.
After two years, researchers used five so-called epigenetic clocks to estimate how much participants had biologically aged. These clocks, or biomarkers, analyze small changes in DNA over time.
Compared to the placebo-only group, people in the multivitamin group aged a bit more slowly, as measured by two of the five clocks.
One clock, dubbed PCGrimAge, showed slowed aging by about 1.4 months; the other, called PCPhenoAge, showed slowed aging by about 2.6 months. Sesso called these two biomarkers “second-generation clocks” that gauge mortality.
Participants in this group who had exhibited accelerated biological aging at the outset saw double the slowing of PCGrimAge, by about 2.8 months.
Cocoa extract didn’t have an effect on any of the five measures of biological aging.
“This is not to say that if you aren’t taking a multivitamin that you must start taking a multivitamin,” Sesso said. “The decision to take a multivitamin is still one that should be always taken in consideration with your health care provider.”
But if you’re already taking a multivitamin, he added, this new research suggests “there’s no reason to stop.”
What is biological aging?
Aging, whether biological or chronological, may seem concrete. In reality, “there is no gold standard measurement of aging,” Daniel Belsky, an associate professor of epidemiology at the Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center at Columbia University, co-wrote in a Nature Medicine commentary published alongside the study Monday. Belsky helped invent one of the epigenetic clocks used in the study: DunedinPACE, which is licensed to TruDiagnostic.
Though more black and white, chronological age has a spectrum. Especially as people live longer, 80 years might look different on a person who’s active and healthy compared with someone who’s bedridden and in poor health.
